If the researcher does not maintain any kind of audit trail, the dependability cannot be assessed and dependability and trustworthiness of the study are diminished. Trustworthiness or rigor of a study refers to the degree of confidence in data, interpretation, and methods used to ensure the quality of a study (Pilot & Beck. A major technique for assessing dependability is the dependability audit in which an independent auditor reviews the activities of the researcher (as recorded in an audit trail in field notes, archives, and reports) to see how well the techniques for meeting the credibility and transferability standards have been followed. The more consistent the researcher has been in this research process, the more dependable are the results. The logic used for selecting people and events to observe, interview, and include in the study should be clearly presented. To check the dependability of a qualitative study, one looks to see if the researcher has been careless or made mistakes in conceptualizing the study, collecting the data, interpreting the findings and reporting results. paradigms,11,12 one classic example will be positivistic versus interpretivistic. This is the third standard for judging qualitative studies and refers to the stability or consistency of the inquiry processes used over time. qualitative research In the literature about validity and reliability in qualitative research a variety of terms are used. Like quantitative research, the qualitative research aims to seek.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |